This month, Germany’s transport minister, Alexander Dobrindt, proposed the first set of rules for autonomous vehicles(自主驾驶车辆). They would define the driver’s role in such cars and govern how such cars perform in crashes where lives might be lost.
The proposal attempts to deal with what some call the “death valley” of autonomous vehicles: the grey area between semi-autonomous and fully driverless cars that could delay the driverless future.
Dobrindt wants three things: that a car always chooses property(财产) damage over personal injury; that it never distinguishes between humans based on age or race; and that if a human removes his or her hands from the driving wheel — to check email, say — the car’s maker is responsible if there is a crash.
“The change to the road traffic law will permit fully automatic driving,” says Dobrindt. It will put fully driverless cars on an equal legal footing to human drivers, he says.
Who is responsible for the operation of such vehicles is not clear among car makers, consumers and lawyers. “The liability(法律责任) issue is the biggest one of them all,” says Natasha Merat at the University of Leeds, UK.
An assumption behind UK insurance for driverless cars, introduced earlier this year, insists that a human “be watchful and monitoring the road” at every moment.
But that is not what many people have in mind when thinking of driverless cars. “When you say ‘driverless cars’, people expect driverless cars.” Merat says. “You know — no driver.”
Because of the confusion, Merat thinks some car makers will wait until vehicles can be fully automated without operation.
Driverless cars may end up being a form of public transport rather than vehicles you own, says Ryan Calo at Stanford University, California. That is happening in the UK and Singapore, where government-provided driverless vehicles are being launched.
That would go down poorly in the US, however. “The idea that the government would take over driverless cars and treat them as a public good would get absolutely nowhere here,” says Calo.
46. What does the phrase “death valley” in Paragraph 2 refer to?
A. A place where cars often break down.
B. A case where passing a law is impossible.
C. An area where no driving is permitted.
D. A situation where drivers’ role is not clear.
47. The proposal put forward by Dobrindt aims to __________.
A. stop people from breaking traffic rules
B. help promote fully automatic driving
C. protect drivers of all ages and races
D. prevent serious property damage
48. What do consumers think of the operation of driverless cars?
A. It should get the attention of insurance companies.
B. It should be the main concern of law makers.
C. It should not cause deadly traffic accidents.
D. It should involve no human responsibility.
49. Driverless vehicles in public transport see no bright future in _________.
A. Singapore B. the UK C. the US D. Germany
50. What could be the best title for the passage?
A. Autonomous Driving: Whose Liability?
B. Fully Automatic Cars: A New Breakthrough
C. Autonomous Vehicles: Driver Removed!
D. Driverless Cars: Root of Road Accidents
【收录时间】
2017-06-20
【知识点】
政治经济文化类阅读
查看答案
加入试题篮
46.【答案】D
【解析】
试题分析：根据第二段的句子the grey area between semi-autonomous and fully driverless cars that could delay the driverless future可知选D。
考点：考查词义猜测。
47.【答案】B
【解析】
考点：考查推理判断。
48.【答案】D
【解析】
试题分析：根据第六、七、八段内容可知选D。
考点：考查细节理解。
49.【答案】C
【解析】
考点：考查细节理解。
50.【答案】A
【解析】
试题分析：通读全文可以知道，本文主要讲述了谁来对无人驾驶的机动车辆负责。故选A。
考点：考查标题归纳。
单日会员可无限次解锁答案，低至9.9》
2017-06-20
阅读理解
中等
扬帆
考点梳理：
根据可圈可点权威老师分析，试题 "
This month, Germany’s transport minister, Alexander Dobrindt, proposed the first set of rules for
" 主要考察你对
政治经济类阅读
等考点的理解。关于这些考点的"梳理资料"如下:
◎ 政治经济类阅读的定义
政治经济类文章的概念：
要做好这类阅读，平时就要注意了解国内外发生的政治经济大事，掌握一定背景知识，对这类文章的叙述特点及内容安排有一定了解，还要扩展这方面的词汇。阅读这类文章，要抓住文章的核心，即文章整体和各段主要在说什么，也要注意段落之间的逻辑关系。
◎ 政治经济类阅读的知识扩展
要做好这类阅读，平时就要注意了解国内外发生的政治经济大事，掌握一定背景知识， 对这类
文章的叙述特点及内容安排有一定了解，还要扩展这方面的词汇。阅读这类文章，要抓 住文章
的核心，即文章整体和各段主要在说什么，也要注意段落之间的逻辑关系。
文章的叙述特点及内容安排有一定了解，还要扩展这方面的词汇。阅读这类文章，要抓 住文章
的核心，即文章整体和各段主要在说什么，也要注意段落之间的逻辑关系。
◎ 政治经济类阅读的知识点拨
如何备考政治经济类阅读理解题：
【题型说明】政治经济类阅读文章是高考常选材料之一。该类文章时代气息浓郁，语言鲜活，但熟字新义词、超纲词及专业词语多，长句、难句多。政治类文章大多数是同学们感性趣的内容，读起来倒有似曾相识的感觉，经济类文章读起来就像是雾里看花，文章看完，一头雾水。再加之这类文章的命题侧重于词义猜测、推理判断和文章主旨，同学们对这类题材是望而生畏。
【备考策略】建立心理优势。针对不同体裁的文章，我们要采取相应的阅读方法和技巧。政治类文章多采用记叙文形式，我们可采取“顺读法”，以便抓关键语句，领会文章主旨；而经济类文章则多采用说明文形式，我们则可以采取“逆读法”，先读试题，再从文章中查找有用信息。若遇到的确难读的材料。千万不用着急，因为你觉得难，其他人也一定是同感。在高考前，我们就要有这种心理准备，高考试卷肯定有一、两篇难以阅读的材料。不过，我们平时可以有意识地从报刊杂志上找一些较难的阅读材料来阅读，以培养自己迎难而上的心理素质。
【答题方法】
1、寻找主干：
根据英语中五种基本句型结构，把句子中的主语、谓语、宾语、表语等主要成分找出来，其他成分如定语、状语、补语等则易于理解。找到了句子主干，句子的意思至少明白了一半。
2、剔除从句：
在一个长句中可能会出现若干个从句，在理解时，如果把各个从句剔除出来单独理解，然后把大意拼凑起来，整个长句的意思就会明白六、七分。
3、辨别分句：
一个长句如果是由几个并列、转折、递进、对比关系的分句组成，句中往往有表示这些分句关系的连接词，只要能弄清楚分句和分句之间的逻辑关系，再把各层分句的意思加以连贯，整个长句的句意基本上能跃然脑中。
4、寻找关键词：
如果一个句子看完，一点句意的感觉也没有，下下策就是抓住句中的关键词，通过关键词大体弄懂这个长句的意思。
◎ 政治经济类阅读的教学目标
1、熟悉并积累关于政治经济类阅读的常用词汇及话题。
2、了解政治经济类话题文章常见的写作手法及文章结构。
2、了解政治经济类话题文章常见的写作手法及文章结构。
◎ 政治经济类阅读的考试要求
能力要求：掌握/应用
课时要求：2
考试频率：常考
分值比重：5
课时要求：2
考试频率：常考
分值比重：5